Ferrari et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Steve Ferrari, Mike Keynejad, Hooshang Jowza, Celseo Frazao, Renuka NARAYAN, Gertrud FRANKRONE, Ernest Salinas, Kalkhusan Sareen, Hossein Jalali, Ron Wolfe, Sohrab Rahimzadeh, Fred Grant, Ester Grant, Vincent Leung, Ken Wong, Jessica Langridge, Tony Nicolosi, Donald Lyang and Artur Semichev |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, AUTOBAHN, INC., David Ahlheim and SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC. |
| 4:2015cv04379 |
| September 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers: granting 73 Motion to Dismiss; granting 81 Motion to Dismiss; granting 86 Motion to Dismiss; vacating 94 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. This action is dismissed with prejudice as to the RICO claims and without prejudice as to all the pendent state law claims. Clerk is directed to close the file. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 30, 2016 HEARING re 81 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) filed by Speedway Motorsports Inc, 86 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Comp laint filed by David Ahlheim, AUTOBAHN, INC., Joe Cox, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC., O. Bruton Smith, 73 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Dietmar Exler. The Court will issue a written decision on the papers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/24/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER DENYING PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CLARIFYING SCOPE OF LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying as moot 69 Stipulation. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting with leave to amend 54 Motion to Dismiss ; granting with leave to amend 55 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING STAY OF DEPOSITIONS re 51 Discovery Letter Brief filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/2/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall file First Amended Complaint no later than 3/8/2016. Defendants' shall file response no later than 3/29/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC; AUTOBAHN, INC., DAVID AHLHEIM, AND SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC. FOR DISMISSAL. The hearings set for February 9, 2016 are VACATED and no appearance is required. The Court will issue a written decision on the papers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/5/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2016)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DETERMINING CASES ARE NOT RELATED; DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers;denying 21 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying as moot 25 Motion to continue hearing and briefing schedule on motion to consolidate; denying 22 motion/notice to relate cases. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
