Williams et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
| Jason Williams, Kevin Cook, Gerwin Gitana, Wade Stone, Brian Antis, Christopher Comyns, Kord Evans, Jacob F. Weidner, Richard Pridmore, Jaime Mendoza, Samour Soeung, Peter Neang, Greg G. Lewis, Jonathan Anglin, Hector Martinez and Dale Stanton |
| Comcast Corporation and Comcast of Contra Costa, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv04732 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sonoma |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/6/17. Show Cause Response due by 9/20/2017.(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
74
Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 70 Discovery Letter Brief.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 14 STIPULATION selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/4/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT: Case Management Statement due by 1/8/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/5/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
