Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California, et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
| Round Valley Indian Tribes of California and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians |
| United States Department of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, Federal Highway Administration, Gregory Nadeau, California Department of Transportation and Malcolm Dougherty |
| 3:2015cv04987 |
| October 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Mendocino |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Nandor J. Vadas |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White DENYING 132 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, 138 Caltrans Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (jswlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2018)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Jeffrey S. White. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, 68 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 10, 2017. (jswlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2017)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART 69 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by California Department of Transportation and CONTINUING Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 2/10/2017. Motion to Amend due by 2/17/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 23, 2017. (jswlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Deferring Ruling on 54 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 11, 2016. (jswlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING 52 STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINES; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/5/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/20/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016) Modified on 6/20/2016 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Amend Case Schedule for Further Settlement Discussions. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/1/2016. Motions due by 6/6/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/8/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/26/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)
|
|
Filing
34
NOTICE of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A Settlement Conference is set for 4/22/2016 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/29/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/17/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
