Securities And Exchange Commission v. Netcirq, LLC

Plaintiff: Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant: Netcirq, LLC
Case Number: 4:2015mc80289
Filed: November 25, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 26, 2016 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 1 Application to Enforce Compliance with Administrative Subpoena.(kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016)
February 22, 2016 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER striking 8 Reply Brief filed by Kristen Wade, CEO of Netcirq, LLC. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/22/2016. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities And Exchange Commission v. Netcirq, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities And Exchange Commission
Represented By: E. Barrett Atwood
Represented By: Joshua M. Newville
Represented By: Jeremy Emerson Pendrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Netcirq, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?