Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. |
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company |
4:2016cv00524 |
February 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Jeffrey S. White |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER PROVIDING OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF 25 MOTION for Release of Bond Obligation and Disposition of Seized Merchandise. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/29/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF QUESTIONS FOR HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/16/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016) |
Filing 19 AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; SEIZURE ORDER; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE, AS MODIFIED. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 2/19/2016 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/3/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 5 Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order and an Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2016 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 02/01/2016. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.