Mark A. Cavender et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Mark A Cavender and Pamela J Cavender |
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
4:2016cv00703 |
February 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Contra Costa |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 25 Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint without leave to amend. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2016) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 23 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Wells Fargo Bank N.A. filed by Pamela J Cavender, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Mark A Cavender, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/19/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Request For Order Changing Time Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 filed by Pamela J Cavender, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Mark A Cavender Amended Pleadings due by 6/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/8/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016) |
Filing 12 ORDER referring case to the ADR Unit for Assessment Telephone Conference to be completed by 3/24/16. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/11/2016. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.