Scott Johnson v. Goodhue et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Neil B. Goodhue, Diane C. Goodhue, Edward Maurice Plant III and Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 4:2016cv00724
Filed: February 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 156 Order y Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 139 Defendant's Motion for Relief From Judgment. Signed on 5/30/2019.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2019)
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER holding in abeyance 139 MOTION for Relief from Judgment filed by Starbucks Corporation pending further discovery and briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/31/2019. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2019)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2018 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. Signed on 10/17/2018.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/24/2018. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 88 Motion to Stay. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018)
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 65 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Vacate Settlement Conference filed by Starbucks Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/8/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott Johnson v. Goodhue et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Mark Dee Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neil B. Goodhue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diane C. Goodhue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Maurice Plant III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Shane Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?