Electronic Frontier Foundation v. United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Case Number: 3:2016cv02041
Filed: April 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 77 JUDGMENT in favor of United States Department of Justice against Electronic Frontier Foundation. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/5/2019. (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2019)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS 66 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS CROSS 68 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Case Management Statement due by 4/5/2019 and Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/9/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019)
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time to File.Motions due by 7/26/2018; Cross Motions due by 8/23/2018; Responses due by 9/20/2018; Replies due by 10/11/2018.; Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2018)
June 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING 62 Proposed Briefing Schedule: Motions due by 7/9/2018; Cross Motions/Oppositions due by 8/6/2018; Responses due by 9/6/2018; Replies due by 9/27/2018; Motion Hearing set for 10/25/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/14/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 60 Unopposed Admin Motion to Vacate Current Briefing Schedule and for an Order Requiring the Parties to Submit a Status Report in Two Weeks. Status Report due by 6/7/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2018)
February 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 58 Stipulated PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motions due by 5/24/2018; Cross Motions/Opposition due by 6/21/2018; Opposition (Cross)/Replies due by 7/19/2018; Replies (cross) due by 8/9/2018; Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018)
December 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Status Report Setting Forth A Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule. Status Report due by 2/16/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2017)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING ( 29 , 32 ) CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Joint Status Report due by 1/8/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2017)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 47 Defendants Unopposed Administrative Motion for an Extension ofthe Deadline for Filing a Joint Status Report (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017)
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation to Stay Briefing, Vacate Hearing for Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Joint Status Report due by 12/15/2016.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2016)
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Reply re 32 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 35 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016)
September 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation Regarding Page Limits on Briefs. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2016)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 25 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/27/16. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Electronic Frontier Foundation v. United States Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Represented By: Nathan Daniel Cardozo
Represented By: Aaron David Mackey
Represented By: Mark Thomas Rumold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: Julia Alexandra Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?