Nadaf-Rahrov v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
Enayatollah Nadaf-Rahrov and Forough Nadaf-Rahrov |
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of New York Mellon |
4:2016cv02112 |
April 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Marin |
Richard Seeborg |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/26/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017) |
Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 46 Stipulation Regarding Dismissal of Defendants Shellpoint and Bank of New York Mellon. Bank of New York Mellon (a national association) and Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (a business entity) terminated. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/26/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017) |
Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying (23) Ex Parte Application in case 3:16-cv-02112-RS; denying (4) Ex Parte Application in case 3:16-cv-06323-RS. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016) |
Filing 32 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 11/22/2016 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/2/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2016) |
Filing 26 ORDER FOR MEET AND CONFER NEGOTIATIONS AND BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.