Williams et al v. Institute of Aging et al
| Tameka Williams, Ronnie Gee, Christy Gee and Johnny Terrell |
| Institute on Aging and Homebridge, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv02256 |
| April 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND ENTIRE ACTION BACK TO SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT filed by Homebridge, Inc., Tameka Williams, Christy Gee, Ronnie Gee, Institute on Aging, Johnny Terrell, ORDER REMANDING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/7/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 5 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Seeking Voluntary Dismissal of Federal Defendants filed by Tameka Williams, Christy Gee, South of Market Health Center Westbrook, LLC, Ronnie Gee, Johnny Terr ell, San Francisco Medical Center Outpatient Improvement Programs, Inc., San Francisco Medical Center Outpatient Improvement Programs, Inc. and South of Market Health Center Westbrook, LLC terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/2/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
