Stanislav Petrov v. Alameda County et al
| Stanislav Petrov |
| Alameda County, Gregory J. Ahern, Paul Wieber, Luis Santamaria, Shawn Osborne, John Malizia, Joshua Miller, Darrin Shelton, Robert Griffith and David Taylor |
| 4:2016cv04323 |
| August 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 60 Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017)
|
|
Filing
53
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/6/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2016)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Stay. Discovery and Rule 26 disclosures as to defendants Wieber and Santamaria only are Stayed. The Court Vacates the hearing on this motion currently set for November 8, 2016. (ygrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*] re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Paul Wieber, Alameda County, Luis Santamaria, Stanislav Petrov, Gregory J. Ahern. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/3/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
