ICE Consulting, Inc. et al v. Jensen
| ICE Consulting, Inc., Uzair Sattar and Derick Needham |
| Gavin Jensen |
| 4:2016cv04349 |
| August 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 108 OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT filed by ICE Consulting, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/19. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017)
|
|
Filing
105
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 103 to Vacate Without Prejudice the Hearing on ICE's Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference. Motions terminated: 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen's Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Counterclaims. Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2017)
|
|
Filing
102
STIPULATION AND ORDER. Motion Hearing as to 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen's Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Counterclaims is set for 2/2/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco befo re Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 1/26/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/2/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/6/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
98
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 96 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION filed by ICE Consulting, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/12/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
92
STIPULATION AND ORDER as to 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen's Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Counterclaims; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Case Management Statement du e by 12/8/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/15/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing reset for 12/15/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/10/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 for Early Settlement Conference filed by Gavin Jensen, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/4/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
72
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 Stipulation by All Parties Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaims and [Proposed] Order filed by ICE Consulting, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/11/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed. Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/16/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2016)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 19 Order on Motion for TRO to Continue Hearing Date filed by Gavin Jensen. Temporary Restraining Order Hearing set for 9/15/2016 01:30 PM.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/17/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
