Mangiaracina et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
| Joel Mangiaracina and Ranee Chaloeicheep |
| BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Contra Costa Transportation Authority and Contra Costa County |
| 3:2016cv05270 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
253
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 15, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2022)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM UNTIMELY DISCLOSURE 207 entered by Judge Jon S. Tigar.
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 123 Motion to Withdraw Admission. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
|
|
Filing
97
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO JOIN NECESSARY PARTY by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 61 Motion for Joinder. Correction of ECF No. 72. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE 87 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/14/2017. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2017)
|
|
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 60 SCHEDULING ORDERfiled by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company. Mediation deadline 3/31/2018. Fact discovery cut-off 2/15/2018. Expert disclos ures 6/8/2018. Expert rebuttal 6/25/2018. Expert discovery cut-off 7/29/2018. Deadline to file dispositive motions 6/6/2018. Pretrial conference statement due 10/2/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/12/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 10/22/2018 - 11/1/2018 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 23, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)
|
|
Filing
78
DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF re 77 Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2017)
|
|
Filing
75
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION DATE filed by Contra Costa County. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 1, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2017)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO JOIN NECESSARY PARTY by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 61 Motion for Joinder. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2017)
|
|
Filing
66
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 61 First MOTION for Joinder of Necessary Party filed by Joel Mangiaracina. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 15, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2017)
|
|
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 57 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Confidentiality Agreement filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 26, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2017)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 2, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 9 Motion to Dismiss; denying 15 Motion to Remand. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
