United States of America et al v. Bell Transit Corporation et al
Case Number: 3:2016cv06994
Filed: May 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/6/2023. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER of conditional partial dismissal. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 2/28/2023. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2023)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 186 Order DENYING 166 relators motion to compel production of documents. The court sustains third-partys objections and QUASHES relators subpoena. Additionally, the court ORDERS the document found at 185 SEALED. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on January 30, 2023. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER re 166 motion to compel compliance with trial subpoena. Relator must file its reply brief by January 24, 2023. The motion will be heard via Zoom on January 26, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on January 19, 2023. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2023)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 144 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 152 Administrative Motion ; denying 153 Administrative Motion. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2022)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 145 Administrative Motion. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER by Judge Hamilton re 140 Discovery Letter Brief. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2022)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion to Dismiss; granting 115 Motion to Dismiss. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 117 Administrative Motion. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 110 administrative motion for extension of time to file complaint and dismissing unserved defendants. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER by Judge Hamilton re 83 Motion to Dismiss; 84 Motion to Dismiss; 99 Motion to Strike; and order to show cause re unserved defendants. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER GRANTING 85 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton.(pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING 67 RELATOR'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. Relator is required to E-FILE the amended document. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 Stipulation filed by Steven Fallon. Initial Case Management Conference continued to: 9/17/2020, at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 5/4/2020. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2020)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Bell Transit Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?