v. In re Petition of Jennifer Granick and Riana Pfefferkorn
4:2016mc80206 |
September 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/20/2019. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019) |
Filing 68 ORDER Vacating Status Date and Setting Motion Hearing. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/13/2019. (pjhlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2019) |
Filing 52 ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and Continuing May 3, 2018 Status Conference. Petitioners' supplemental brief is due by June 15, 2018. Government's response is due by July 6, 2018. Status Conference set for 8/16/2018 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/1/2018. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2018) |
Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 8 Motion to Unseal Document. Status Report due by 8/22/2017. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: v. In re Petition of Jennifer Granick and Riana Pfefferkorn | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.