Vietnam Reform Party v. Viet Tan - Vietnam Reform Party et al
Vietnam Reform Party |
Viet Tan - Vietnam Reform Party, Nguyen Thanh Tu and Michelle Duong |
5:2017cv00291 |
January 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Santa Clara |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 107 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020) |
Filing 105 JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/30/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
Filing 91 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2019.Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/4/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2019) |
Filing 90 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 86 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/3/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2019) |
Filing 85 ORDER Granting 84 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NGUYEN THANH TU ONLY. Nguyen Thanh Tu terminated.Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/27/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2018) |
Filing 53 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 52 Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.