Franklin v. City of San Leandro et al
Plaintiff: Ron Franklin
Defendant: City of San Leandro and Dennis Mally
Case Number: 3:2017cv00789
Filed: February 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 75 Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/6/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2019)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 51 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2019)
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend Expert Discovery Deadlines.Opening Reports due by 4/11/2019; Rebuttal Reports due by 4/26/2019; and Close of Expert Discovery due by 5/10/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019)
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 47 Stipulation for Partial Modification of Scheduling Order.Close of Fact Discovery due by 3/25/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2019)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Stipulation Continuing Mediation Compliance Deadline.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2019)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018)
April 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 24 MOTION TO DISMISS.Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2018)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS 8 MOTION TO DISMISS. Amended Pleadings due by 12/26/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. City of San Leandro et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ron Franklin
Represented By: John L. Burris
Represented By: DeWitt Marcellus Lacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Leandro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Mally
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?