JaM Cellars, Inc. v. Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.

Plaintiff: JaM Cellars, Inc.
Defendant: Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2017cv01133
Filed: March 6, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Napa
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 28, 2017 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/28/2017. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)
June 12, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING 13 MOTION TO STRIKE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/12/2017. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JaM Cellars, Inc. v. Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JaM Cellars, Inc.
Represented By: Paul William Reidl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vintage Wine Estates, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence Griffith Townsend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?