Joint Venture Partners International, Inc. v. Clyne
| Joint Venture Partners International, Inc. |
| Ian Clyne |
| Jay Dee Shiverdaker and Joint Venture Partners International, Inc. |
| 4:2017cv02515 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Napa |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/4/2018 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2018. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/30/2018. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING 38 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/20/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING 43 REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT MOTION HEARING. COUNSEL SHALL CONTACT COURTCALL DIRECTLY TO ARRANGE FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/27/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018) Modified text on 2/27/2018 (amkS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING 32 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/13/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/11/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
