Hollis v. Kim et al
| Kimmara Hollis |
| Hyo Kim, Kate Kim, Francisco Coello, Francisco Coelle , Jr. and Sonia Dominguez |
| 4:2017cv02839 |
| May 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 33 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Kimmara Hollis, United States of America. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/11/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2018)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Kate Kim, Hyo Kim, Kimmara Hollis. Case Management Statement due by 1/30/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/6/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/6/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER OF SERVICE The U.S. Marshal shall serve the complaint. Initial Case Management Conference is continued to 11/7/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/31/2017. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 8/8/2017. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
