Nevarez et al v. Canyon Lakes Golf Course & Brewery LLC et al
| Abdul Nevarez and Priscilla Nevarez |
| Canyon Lakes Golf Course & Brewery LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE |
| 4:2017cv03247 |
| June 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time Under FRCP Rule 12(f) filed by Priscilla Nevarez, Canyon Lakes Golf Course & Brewery LLC, Abdul Nevarez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/4/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2018)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying Defendant's 12 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file its answer within 21 days of this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 14 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Briefing Schedule on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Priscilla Nevarez, Canyon Lakes Golf Course & Brewery LLC, Abdul Nevarez. Set/Re set Deadlines as to 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Briefing Schedule on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, 12 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 10/10/2017. Replies due by 10/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/19/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
