Miller v. Amazon.com, LLC
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 29, 2018
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Amazon's motion to dism iss is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: The First through Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action are dismissed in their entirety; The Sixth Cause of Action is dismissed to the extent it is based on the First through Fourth Causes of Action; The Ninth Cause of Action is dismissed to the extent it is based on the First through Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action, and to the extent it is based on the portion of the Sixth Cause of Action that is subject to dismissal; In all other respects, the motion is denied. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is granted, and plaintiff shall file a Third Amended Complaint no later than April 27, 2018; if plaintiff does not file a Third Amended Complaint within the time pr ovided, the instant action will proceed on the remaining claims in the SAC. Amazon's motion to strike is denied without prejudice. The Case Management Conference is continued from April 27, 2018, to June 29, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.; a Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than June 22, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 29, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?