Immersion Corporation v. Fitbit, Inc.

Plaintiff: Immersion Corporation
Defendant: Fitbit, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2017cv03886
Filed: July 10, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 6, 2018 64 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, granting 62 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 3/6/2018 (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2018)
March 5, 2018 63 Opinion or Order of the Court Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting in Part and Denying in Part 23 Motion to Dismiss.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Immersion Corporation v. Fitbit, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Immersion Corporation
Represented By: Courtland Lewis Reichman
Represented By: Bahrad A. Sokhansanj
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fitbit, Inc.
Represented By: Adam R. Alper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?