Bradford v. Voong et al
| Sylvester Bradford |
| Minh Voong, Jeffrey Beard, J. Barba, M. Ramirez, D. N. McCall, Arnold and M. E. Spearman |
| 4:2017cv04964 |
| August 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Monterey |
| PSLC MSH |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/10/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/9/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR SCREENING; DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 5/30/2018. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/2/18. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
