Peterson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Michael Peterson and Toni Peterson |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
3:2017cv05137 |
September 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Sonoma |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 SUA SPONTE REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/12/2019. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
Filing 49 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS 36 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Case Management Statement due by 5/1/2018; and Case Management Conference set for 5/8/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2018) |
Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Motion to Continue Mediation Completion Date. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2018) |
Filing 42 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 41 Motion to Continue Mediation Completion Date. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018) |
Filing 34 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 21 MOTION TO DISMISS. Amended Pleadings due by 1/18/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2017) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.