Garcia v. Zavala et al
Angelica Garcia |
Pascual Zavala, Miriam Arevalo and P & Z Foods Inc. |
4:2017cv06253 |
October 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Maria-Elena James |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 7, 2022. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO DISMISS CLASS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN ADVANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 9, 2021. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 59 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 57 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
Filing 30 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 5/30/2018. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/25/2018. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.