Turano v. County of Alameda et al
| Cynthia N Turano |
| County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Gregory J. Ahern, Brett Keteles, Tom Madigan, D Skoldqvist, City Of Oakland, Oakland Police Department, J Durant, J Adaya and Ryan Paul Tloyao |
| 3:2017cv06953 |
| December 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER TO FILE DISMISSAL WITHIN 180 DAYS in light of settlement. JOINT STATUS REPORT ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 9/20/2019. All other case deadlines are vacated. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/23/2019. (kawlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for Failure to Appear at the Case Management Conference. Show Cause Response due by 2/28/2019. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/20/2019. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2019)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Dismiss. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Dismiss; denying 39 Motion to Strike. Initial case management conference continued from November 13, 2018 to February 19, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Case management statement due by February 12, 2019. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting 42 Motion to Enlarge Time; Denying 41 Ex Parte Application to Strike Defendants' Motions as Untimely. Plaintiff's oppositions to Defendants' motions due by 8/29/2018. Defendants' replies due by 9/5/2018. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 18 25 Motions to Dismiss; denying 27 Motion for Leave to Amend. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 24 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Phone Conference filed by City Of Oakland, J Adaya, Tom Madigan, Cynthia N Turano, J Durant, County of Alameda, Oakland Police Department, Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Ryan Paul Tloyao, D Skoldqvist, Brett Keteles, Gregory J. Ahern. Case Management Statement due by 7/24/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/31/2018 01:30 PM. ADR deadline continued to 8/31/18. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/27/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC re 15 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 12 Stipulation and Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings, Continue Case Management Conference filed by Cynthia N Turano. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/8/2018 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/14/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2018)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 11 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by City Of Oakland, J Adaya, Tom Madigan, Cynthia N Turano, J Durant, County of Alameda, Ryan Paul Tloyao, D Skoldqvist, Brett Keteles, Gregory J. Ahern. Case Management Statement due by 4/24/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/1/2018 01:30 PM. ADR deadline set for 4/13/18. Answer due by 4/27/18. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/27/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
