Berman v. Freedom Financial Network, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Berman
Defendant: Freedom Financial Network, LLC and Freedom Debt Relief, LLC
Case Number: 4:2018cv01060
Filed: February 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 284 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATING MOTIONS. The case is stayed pending appeal of Defendants. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/29/2021. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2021)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 280 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 268 Motion for Reconsideration. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2020)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 266 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 224 Motion to Compel. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2020)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 211 ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING; SETTING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE re 210 Status Report filed by Lead Science, LLC, Freedom Financial Network, LLC, Daniel Berman, Freedom Debt Relief, LLC, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 210 Stat us Report. The Compliance hearing currently set for October 25, 2019 is VACATED. Amended Pleadings due by 12/9/2019. Close of Expert Discovery due by 4/20/2020. Fact Discovery reopens 10/25/2019. Close of Fact Discovery by 3/25/2020. Opening Re ports due by 3/16/2020. Rebuttal Reports due by 4/6/2020. Renewed Motion for class certification due by 5/18/2020. Responses due by 6/8/2020. Replies due by 6/29/2020. Renewed Motion for Class Certification Hearing set for 7/14/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/24/2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO LIMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT; DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; withdrawing 90 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; withdrawing 97 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; withdrawing 138 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying without prejudice 139 Moti on to Certify Class; granting in part and denying in part 153 Motion ; withdrawing 154 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 156 Motion for Summary Judgment; withdrawing 157 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; withdrawin g 164 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; withdrawing 170 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2019. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2019)
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE. 158 Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/13/2019. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2019)
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(1) AND TO STRIKE ALLEGATIONS OR DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; denying 94 Motion to Dismiss; denying 120 Motion for Leave to File. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2019)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 136 Discovery Letter Brief. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley Re: 89 Joint Discovery Letter Brief. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion for Leave to File. Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2018)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berman v. Freedom Financial Network, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Berman
Represented By: Jon Bernhard Fougner
Represented By: Anthony I. Paronich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freedom Financial Network, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freedom Debt Relief, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?