Pugh et al v. Metlife, Inc. et al
| Tillman Pugh, Margaret Sulkowski, David Henderson and Roy Reese |
| Metlife, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife Resources, Inc. and Metlife Securities, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv01506 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND ORDER ; ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; re 67 Stipulation filed by Tillman Pugh, David Henderson, Margaret Sulkowski, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/4/2019. ** The Friday, 9/6/2019 at 9:01 AM Compliance hearing is VACATED.**(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2019)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 32 Motion to Remand. The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for February 12, 2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2019)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION [*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/17/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)
|
|
Filing
28
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/9/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
