Ali v. Silicon Valley Bank
| Syed Nazim Ali |
| Silicon Valley Bank |
| 4:2018cv03999 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10 /2/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/9/2018 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/17/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Silicon Valley Bank (Boomer, Mitchell) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Silicon Valley Bank identifying Corporate Parent Vanguard Group Inc. for Silicon Valley Bank. (Boomer, Mitchell) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Silicon Valley Bank identifying Corporate Parent Silicon Valley Bank, Other Affiliate Syed Nazim Ali, Other Affiliate Jackson Lewis PC for Silicon Valley Bank. (Boomer, Mitchell) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 18CV329092. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12484135). Filed bySilicon Valley Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration of Mitchell F. Boomer)(Boomer, Mitchell) (Filed on 7/3/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ali v. Silicon Valley Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Silicon Valley Bank | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell F. Boomer |
| Represented By: | Scott Philip Jang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Syed Nazim Ali | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
