Smith v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
| LaJazz Smith |
| California Correctional Health Care Services, G. Tortoreilli and Salinas Valley State Prisons |
| 4:2018cv04087 |
| July 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| PSLC GRC |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Northern District of California*. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LaJazz Smith. (jms) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LaJazz Smith. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against California Correctional Health Care Services, Salinas Valley State Prisons, G. Tortoreilli, filed by LaJazz Smith. ($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1151-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
