Kimbrell v. Twitter Inc.
Jody Diane Kimbrell |
Twitter Inc. |
Jody D. Kimbrell |
4:2018cv04144 |
July 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Phyllis J Hamilton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jody D. Kimbrell. (ddkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018) |
Filing 3 ***DISREGARD, INCORRECT FORM USED. SEE DOCKET #6 FOR CORRECTED ENTRY***MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Jody D. Kimbrell. (ddkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018) Modified on 7/20/2018 (kcS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/25/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor. (ddkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/13/2018: #1 Standing Order) (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Twitter Inc. (Filing fee $ 400. Receipt number 34611135057). Filed by Jody D. Kimbrell. (Attachments: #1 receipt)(ddkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2018: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ddkS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 7/13/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.