RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. v. Nisene Technology Group, Inc.
| RKD Engineering Corp. and RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. |
| NISENE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. |
| 4:2018cv04321 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 183 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time To Respond To The Complaint Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(a) filed by Nisene Technology Group, Inc. and RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. (Ertas, Alper) (Filed on 8/15/2018) Modified on 8/16/2018 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for October 23, 2018, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by October 16, 2018. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:18-cv-04321-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2018) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Daniel J Kaschalk for RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc.. (Payne, Robert) (Filed on 8/2/2018) |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Nisene Technology Group, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Nina Wagner, Other Affiliate Alan M. Wagner, Other Affiliate Lenna Wagner, Other Affiliate Bert Wagner for Nisene Technology Group, Inc. (Ertas, Alper) (Filed on 7/31/2018) Modified on 8/1/2018 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William Andrew Hector (Hector, William) (Filed on 7/31/2018) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Alper T. Ertas (Ertas, Alper) (Filed on 7/31/2018) |
| #Electronic filing error. Names of interested entities or person MUST be entered at the prompt. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its enti rety Re: #10 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc. (Payne, Robert) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Nisene Technology Group, Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Payne, Robert) (Filed on 7/26/2018) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/25/18. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2018)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2018) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc... (Payne, Robert) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent infringment (cc: form transmitted to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/18/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/31/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nisene Technology Group, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12519518.). Filed by RKD Engineering Corporation, Inc.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Payne, Robert) (Filed on 7/17/2018) Modified on 7/18/2018 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
