DOE et al v. Risch et al
| JANE DOE and JOHN DOE |
| Paul R. Malik, Edward Ramotowski and Carl Risch |
| 4:2018cv04583 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 19 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by JANE DOE, JOHN DOE.. (Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/14/2018) |
| Filing 16 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/27/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #14 Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11, Plaintiff's Disclosure of True Name by JANE DOE, JOHN DOE. (Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/16/2018) Modified on 8/17/2018 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER THE PSEUDONYMS JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE. Re: ECF #13 . Plaintiffs' counsel must within 3 days of this order file with the Court, and serve upon opposing counsel, a document under seal that reveals the true names of the Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
|
| Filing 13 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Under the Pseudonyms John and Jane Doe filed by JANE DOE, JOHN DOE. Responses due by 8/6/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jane Doe, #2 Declaration of Jennifer Nimer, #3 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 7/31/2018) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Jennifer Nimer Pro Hac Vice #4 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018)
|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Carl Risch c/o U. S. Attorney General. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Paul R. Malik. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Edward Ramotowski. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Carl Risch. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 6 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/13/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12552051.) filed by JANE DOE, JOHN DOE. (Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/13/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Paul R. Malik, Edward Ramotowski, Carl Risch ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12551643.). Filed byJANE DOE, JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nimer, Jennifer) (Filed on 7/30/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
