Unobskey, et al v. Federal Insurance Company
| Sidney Unobskey and Nancy Unobskey |
| Federal Insurance Company |
| 4:2018cv04697 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2018. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2018 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/13/18. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/13/18. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Federal Insurance Company.. (Gross, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/9/2018) |
| Filing 7 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Federal Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent CHUBB GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., Corporate Parent CHUBB INA HOLDINGS, INC., Corporate Parent Chubb Ltd. for Federal Insurance Company. (Gross, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/9/2018) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Nancy Unobskey, Sidney Unobskey. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/8/2018) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Federal Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Gross, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/7/2018) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nancy Unobskey, Sidney Unobskey.. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/7/2018) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2018 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/20/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2018) |
| Answer to Removed Complaint (See Doc No. #1 -4 by Federal Insurance Company. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-18-564293. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0971-12568173). Filed by Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Gross, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/3/2018) Modified on 8/6/2018 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
