Fremont Bank v. Signorelli et al
| Fremont Bank |
| Robert J Signorelli, Kathryn R Signorelli and Singorelli Family, L.P. |
| 3:2018cv04808 |
| August 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 112 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE 99 MOTION FOR AN ORDER CHARGING INTEREST. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2023)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER GRANTING 95 Proposed Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney. Attorney Robin Marie Pearson terminated. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/11/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2022)
|
|
Filing
91
CONTEMPT ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/29/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2022)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/25/2022 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/29/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2022)
|
|
Filing
57
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Fremont Bank against Singorelli Family, L.P., Kathryn R Signorelli, Robert J Signorelli. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2019)
|
|
Filing
47
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Close of Fact Discovery due by 3/11/2019; Opening Reports due by 3/18/2019; Rebuttal Reports due by 3/25/2019; Close of Expert Discovery due by 4/19/2019; Pretrial Conference set for 6/1 1/2019 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (2-day) set for 6/24/2019 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (This order terminates 30 Stipulation).(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT RESCIND OR MODIFY WRITS OF ATTACHMENT.Show Cause Response due by 1/11/2019. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/10/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2019)
|
|
Filing
40
WRIT of Attachment issued as to Robert J. Signorelli, Signorelli Family L.P., and Signorelli Family Living Trust with copy of order # 37 attached. (Original writ mailed to submitting party). (Attachments: # 1 Writ issued as to Signorelli Family, L.P., # 2 Writ issued as to Signorelly Family Living Trust, # 3 Copy of Order)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2019)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 35 RENEWED APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND WRIT OF ATTACHMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2019)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 13 APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND WRIT OF ATTACHMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 13 MOTION for Right to Attach Order, Issuance of Writ of Attachment, and Temporary Protective Order Against Defendants Robert J. Signorelli, Kathryn R. Signorelli, Signorelli Family Living Trust, and Signorelli Family, L.P. : Responses due by 10/22/2018 and Replies due by 10/29/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
