Bickman et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
Katherine Souers and Jesse Bickman |
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Thomas Schmalzried, M.D. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. |
4:2018cv05869 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Jeffrey S White |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE granting #7 Stipulation to Stay All Proceedings. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2018) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay All Proceedings filed by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Katherine Souers and Jesse Bickman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Regarding Stipulation to Stay All Proceedings)(Anderson-Thompson, Gabrielle) (Filed on 9/28/2018) Modified on 10/1/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Adam Mosier (Mosier, Robert) (Filed on 9/28/2018) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 12/21/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/28/2018 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/11/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2018) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc... (Anderson-Thompson, Gabrielle) (Filed on 9/24/2018) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson International, Corporate Parent DePuy Synthes, Inc. for DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson International for Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.. (Anderson-Thompson, Gabrielle) (Filed on 9/24/2018) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand by both) of Action Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b) (Diversity) from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-11-515876 / JCCP 4662. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12706574). Filed by Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal of Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson-Thompson, Gabrielle) (Filed on 9/24/2018) Modified on 9/28/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/28/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.