Conway v. Northfield Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Shirley Conway
Defendant: Northfield Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2018cv06407
Filed: October 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Referring Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Filing 11 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (McCallum, Lenell) (Filed on 12/17/2018)
December 6, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 12/31/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for MONDAY, 1/7/2019 02:00 PM before Judge Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2018) Modified on 12/6/2018 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
October 24, 2018 Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Shirley Conway (Hutchinson, A.) (Filed on 10/24/2018)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2018)
October 23, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2018)
October 23, 2018 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Northfield Insurance Company.. (Celebrezze, Bruce) (Filed on 10/23/2018)
October 22, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Northfield Insurance Company of Additional Documents Served on Plaintiff per Court Instructions (Celebrezze, Bruce) (Filed on 10/22/2018)
October 19, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/23/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/30/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
October 19, 2018 #1 Answer to Complaint. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
October 19, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/2/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
October 19, 2018 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Northfield Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Corporate Parent Travelers Companies, Inc., Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Inc, Corporate Parent Jupiter Holdings, Corporate Parent Travelers Indemnity Co., Corporate Parent Northland Insurance Company for Northfield Insurance Company. (Celebrezze, Bruce) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
October 19, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-18-569792. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12778305). Filed byNorthfield Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Celebrezze, Bruce) (Filed on 10/19/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conway v. Northfield Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northfield Insurance Company
Represented By: Bruce D. Celebrezze
Represented By: Lenell Topol McCallum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley Conway
Represented By: A. Geoffrey Hutchinson
Represented By: John R. Campo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?