Anderson v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
| Stephen Anderson |
| Salesforce.com, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv06712 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Phyllis J Hamilton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ARBITRATE PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAIM AND TO DISMISS CASE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting #18 Stipulation. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2018)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Arbitrate Plaintiff's Remaining Claim and to Dismiss Case filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. and Stephen Anderson. (Schwartz, Jason) (Filed on 12/31/2018) Modified on 1/2/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 17
ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
|
|
Filing 16
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting #15 Stipulation. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2018)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER Staying Discovery Pending Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Salesforce.com, Inc., Stephen Anderson. (Schwartz, Jason) (Filed on 12/11/2018) Modified on 12/11/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 Declaration of Jason Schwartz in Support of #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Corrected Declaration to replace Dkt. 13-1 filed bySalesforce.com, Inc.. (Related document(s) #13 ) (Schwartz, Jason) (Filed on 12/5/2018) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Salesforce.com, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2019 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor before Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. Responses due by 12/19/2018. Replies due by 12/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jason Schwartz in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Jason Schwartz, #3 Declaration of Kimberly Strashovskiy in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #4 Exhibit A to Declaration of Kimberly Strashovskiy, #5 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings)(Schwartz, Jason) (Filed on 12/5/2018) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Zoe A. Klein. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2018)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: Zoe A. Klein (Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12898390) Filing fee previously paid on 12/4/2018 filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Klein, Zoe) (Filed on 12/4/2018) Modified on 12/5/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Jason C. Schwartz. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)
|
| Filing 9 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Salesforce.com, Inc., Stephen Anderson. (Gorman, Joseph) (Filed on 11/19/2018) Modified on 11/20/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Gorman, Joseph) (Filed on 11/19/2018) Modified on 11/20/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: Jason C. Schwartz (Filing fee $310, receipt number 0971-12860568) filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Schwartz, Jason) (Filed on 11/19/2018) Modified on 11/20/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Abraham Gorman (Gorman, Joseph) (Filed on 11/19/2018) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stephen Anderson (Gage, Nicole) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Salesforce.com, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/ 14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against All Defendants (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0971-12822408). Filed by Stephen Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Gage, Nicole) (Filed on 11/5/2018) Modified on 11/6/2018 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
