Knight et al v. Concentrix Corporation
Plaintiff: Aquanetta Wright, Laprincess June and Jacqlyn Knight
Defendant: Concentrix Corporation
Case Number: 4:2018cv07101
Filed: November 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Jacob R. Rusch.(napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
January 17, 2019 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Laprincess June, Aquanetta Wright, Jacqlyn Knight. Service waived by Concentrix Corporation waiver sent on 12/28/2018, answer due 2/26/2019. (Nephew, Molly) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13009605.) filed by Laprincess June, Jacqlyn Knight, Aquanetta Wright. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Rusch, Jacob) (Filed on 1/16/2019)
November 28, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE by Laprincess June, Jacqlyn Knight, Aquanetta Wright Notice of Filing Consent to Sue (Attachments: #1 Consent to Sue)(Nephew, Molly) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order, signed 11/28/18 by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Molly E. Nephew.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
November 27, 2018 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Laprincess June, Jacqlyn Knight, Aquanetta Wright.. (Burton, Mark) (Filed on 11/27/2018)
November 27, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12875485.) filed by Laprincess June, Jacqlyn Knight, Aquanetta Wright. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Nephew, Molly) (Filed on 11/27/2018)
November 26, 2018 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/ 12/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/19/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
November 26, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Concentrix Corporation. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/5/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Burton, Mark) (Filed on 11/21/2018)
November 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Concentrix Corporation with jury demand ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12867393.). Filed by Laprincess June, Aquanetta Wright, Jacqlyn Knight. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burton, Mark) (Filed on 11/21/2018) Modified on 11/26/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knight et al v. Concentrix Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aquanetta Wright
Represented By: Mark Etheredge Burton, Jr.
Represented By: Molly Elizabeth Nephew
Represented By: Jacob R. Rusch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laprincess June
Represented By: Mark Etheredge Burton, Jr.
Represented By: Molly Elizabeth Nephew
Represented By: Jacob R. Rusch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqlyn Knight
Represented By: Mark Etheredge Burton, Jr.
Represented By: Molly Elizabeth Nephew
Represented By: Jacob R. Rusch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concentrix Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?