Abante Rooter and Plumbing v. Straight Line Source Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Abante Rooter and Plumbing
Defendant: Merchant Advance Express Inc. and Straight Line Source Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv07230
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2018 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Abante Rooter and Plumbing.. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 12/10/2018)
November 30, 2018 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/5/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2018)
November 30, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merchant Advance Express Inc., Straight Line Source Inc. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2018)
November 30, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/14/2018. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2018)
November 29, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Merchant Advance Express Inc., Straight Line Source Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12885509.). Filed by Abante Rooter and Plumbing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 11/29/2018) Modified on 11/30/2018 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abante Rooter and Plumbing v. Straight Line Source Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merchant Advance Express Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Straight Line Source Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abante Rooter and Plumbing
Represented By: Todd Michael Friedman
Represented By: Adrian R. Bacon
Represented By: Thomas Edward Wheeler
Represented By: Meghan Elisabeth George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?