Quair v. CSP-San Quentin et al
David S. Quair, III |
CDCR and CSP-San Quentin |
4:2019cv00454 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC GRC |
Donna M Ryu |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Sent copy of docket sheet to Petitioner. (aea, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David S. Quair, III. (Attachments: #1 **SEE ATTACHMENT 3 FOR CORRECTED DOCUMENT** IFP Short Form, #2 Envelope)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2019: #3 Correction of Attachment 1) (jjbS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 2/8/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David S. Quair, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019) |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to a Magistrate Judge. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 3/4/2019. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed byDavid S. Quair, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.