Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Monique Williams |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak, Union Pacific Railroad Company, County of Contra Costa, City of Richmond, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak |
4:2019cv00576 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 5/6/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday, 5/13/2019 02:00 PM before Judge Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019) |
Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Monique Williams. (Anthony, Steven) (Filed on 2/14/2019) |
Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Judge William H. Orrick no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Executive Committee on 2/14/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2019) |
Filing 10 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/13/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2019) |
Filing 9 ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/12/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Other Affiliate Southern Pacific Rail Corporation, Other Affiliate Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by National Railroad Passenger Corporation identifying Other Affiliate Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Other Affiliate Canadian National Railway Company, Other Affiliate American Premier Underwriters, Inc., Other Affiliate Burlington Northern and Santa Fe LLC, Other Affiliate Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, Other Affiliate Washington Terminal Company for National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 2/11/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/29/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/15/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2019) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Trial Demand filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, dba Amtrak. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 2/1/2019) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Their case number is C18-02144, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13056247). Filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, dba Amtrak. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Exhibit B, #(3) Civil Cover Sheet, #(4) Certificate/Proof of Service)(Schroeder, Jeremy) (Filed on 2/1/2019) Modified on 2/4/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.