Luo v. Nielsen et al
Jianwei Luo |
Kirstjen Nielsen and William Barr |
4:2019cv01704 |
April 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Donna M Ryu |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #12 Stipulation to Extend Time to 7/25/19 within which Defendants must file a response to the Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2019) |
Filing 12 Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File A Response filed by William Barr, Kirstjen Nielsen, Jianwei Luo. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Winslow, Sara) (Filed on 6/24/2019) Modified on 6/25/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by William Barr, Kirstjen Nielsen.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Winslow, Sara) (Filed on 6/24/2019) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jianwei Luo. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2019) |
Filing 9 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Documents as to #6 Summons Issued by the US Marshals. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019) Modified on 4/10/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to William Barr, Kirstjen Nielsen, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 USM-285, #3 USM-285)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE #3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, CLERK TO ISSUE SUMMONS AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY U.S. MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Clerk shall issue summons, and the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments, attachments, scheduling orders, plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon the defendants. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jianwei Luo. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 2 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Kirstjen Nielsen (No process). Filed by Jianwei Luo. Consent/Declination due by 4/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(rcsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) Modified on 4/3/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.