ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. v. Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. et al
| ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. |
| Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. and MSI Computer Corp. |
| 4:2019cv02140 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Second STIPULATION to Extend Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Complaint filed by MSI Computer Corp., Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. and ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. (Vakil, Bijal) (Filed on 7/8/2019) Modified on 7/8/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ONE WEEK. Due to the Court's schedule, the Monday 8/12/2019 Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to Monday, August 19, 2019 at 02:00 PM before Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/12/2019. The Monday 8/12/2019 hearing date is VACATED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Complaint filed by MSI Computer Corp., Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. and ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. (Vakil, Bijal) (Filed on 5/10/2019) Modified on 5/13/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to MSI Computer Corp., Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2019) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons (Proposed Summons to Defendant MSI Computer Corp.))(Miclean, David) (Filed on 4/22/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 8/5/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13276484.). Filed by ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miclean, David) (Filed on 4/19/2019) Modified on 4/22/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
