Jennings et al v. Parker
| Raj Patel, Justin Hu, Lawrence Drouin, Laurence Jennings, Bayside Court Owners Association and Andrew Cantor |
| U.S. Trustee Office of the U.S. Trustee /Oakland and Martha G. Bronitsky |
| Sara-Jane Parker |
| 4:2019cv02588 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Bayside Court Owners Association, Andrew Cantor, Lawrence Drouin, Justin Hu, Laurence Jennings, Raj Patel. Amendment to #6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief re #5 Certificate of Record, #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - Bankruptcy Case REVISED EXHIBIT A. (Hiser, Miriam) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
| Filing 8 REPLY (re #6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief re #5 Certificate of Record, #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - Bankruptcy Case ) filed byBayside Court Owners Association, Andrew Cantor, Lawrence Drouin, Justin Hu, Laurence Jennings, Raj Patel. (Hiser, Miriam) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
| Filing 7 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief re #5 Certificate of Record, #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - Bankruptcy Case ) filed bySara-Jane Parker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Fong, Marlene) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION extension of time to file Appellant's Opening Brief re #5 Certificate of Record, #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - Bankruptcy Case filed by Bayside Court Owners Association, Andrew Cantor, Lawrence Drouin, Justin Hu, Laurence Jennings, Raj Patel. Responses due by 7/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Hiser, Miriam) (Filed on 7/10/2019) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED Certificate of Record forwarded to USCA by U.S. Bankruptcy Court. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Transfer of Appeal to District Court. (Attachments: #1 Appellee Statement of Election to Proceed in District Court, #2 Notice of Appeal, #3 Notice of Referral of Appeal to Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, #4 Transmittal of Notice of Appeal to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, #5 Opening Letter, #6 Briefing Order, #7 Certificate of Readiness, #8 Corprate Parent Disclosure Statement, #9 General Docket U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit, #10 Transmittal of Record on Appeal to BAP)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2019) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL by Sara-Jane Parker (Attachments: #1 Notice of CROSS-APPEAL and Statement of Election, #2 Court's Certification of Mailing, #3 USBC docket sheet, #4 Copy of Notice of Appeal)(cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order - Bankruptcy Case (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 14-44083-CN; BAP No. NC-19-1103 Filed byAndrew Cantor, Raj Patel, Lawrence Drouin, Bayside Court Owners Association, Laurence Jennings, Justin Hu. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 USBC Docket Sheet, #3 Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Costs, #4 Judgment, #5 Appelee Statement of Election)(cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
