Raphael v. Hardin
| Michael Raphael |
| Larence Hardin, Sr. |
| 4:2019cv02923 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION AND SCREENING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E) by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Amended Pleadings due by 8/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2019)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
| Filing 5 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2019) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/25/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Raphael. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larence Hardin, Sr. Filed by Michael Raphael. Consent/Declination due by 6/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Raphael v. Hardin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Raphael | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Larence Hardin, Sr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
