Giannini v. Nexmo Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Eric Giannini
Defendant: Vonage Holdings Corp. and Nexmo Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv03127
Filed: June 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2019 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE: Due to Court unavailability, Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2020 is vacated and rescheduled for 1/16/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2019)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/25/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2019)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order as Modified by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #11 Joint Stipulation to Proceed With Arbitration.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2019)
June 18, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Proceed with Arbitration filed by Nexmo Inc.. (Torres, Britney) (Filed on 6/18/2019)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 06/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
June 14, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp... (Kinoshita, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 6, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. re Order Setting Initial Case Management Conferece and ADR Deadlines; General Order No. 71; and Notice of Electronic Filing of the Answer to Removal Complaint by Nexmo, Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. (Kinoshita, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
June 6, 2019 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/ 28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
June 6, 2019 Answer to Removal Complaint byNexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. re Defendants' Notice of Removal to Federal Court; Civil Cover Sheet; Declaration of Susan Quackenbush ISO Defendants' Removal; Defendants' Certification of Interested Entities or Persons; Defendants' Corporate Disclosure Statement; Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu; Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu; [Blank] Joint Case Managment Statement & Proposed Order; and [Blank] Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Kinoshita, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/19/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. (Cha, Kai-Ching) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Vonage Holdings Corp. for Nexmo Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp.. (Kinoshita, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF REMOVAL to Federal Court from San Francisco Superior Court. (No Process). Their case number is CGC-19-574951. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13410240). Filed byVonage Holdings Corp., Nexmo Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Susan Quackenbush in Support of Defendants Nexmo Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp.'s Notice of Removal to Federal Court)(Kinoshita, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/5/2019) Modified on 6/6/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giannini v. Nexmo Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vonage Holdings Corp.
Represented By: Cheryl A Kinoshita
Represented By: Kai-Ching Cha
Represented By: Britney N. Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nexmo Inc.
Represented By: Cheryl A Kinoshita
Represented By: Kai-Ching Cha
Represented By: Britney N. Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Giannini
Represented By: Justin Lo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?