Penning v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 et al
Plaintiff: Stacy Penning
Defendant: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 and Service Employees International Union
Case Number: 4:2019cv03624
Filed: June 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2019 Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Casey Pitts (Pitts, Patrick) (Filed on 8/1/2019)
August 1, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Alan Kronland (Kronland, Scott) (Filed on 8/1/2019)
August 1, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey B. Demain (Demain, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/1/2019)
July 31, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Caren P. Sencer as counsel for Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 (Sencer, Caren) (Filed on 7/31/2019)
July 31, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Jason Wiesner (Wiesner, Eric) (Filed on 7/31/2019)
July 30, 2019 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE: The court has reviewed the motion to relate filed in case 19-cv-00426-VC, Aliser v. SEIU California, and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2019)
July 16, 2019 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for MONDAY, 10/7/2019 02:00 PM before Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2019)
July 12, 2019 Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Stacy Penning. Service waived by Service Employees International Union waiver sent on 7/11/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 7/12/2019)
July 12, 2019 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Stacy Penning. Service waived by Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 waiver sent on 7/11/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 7/12/2019)
July 12, 2019 REMINDER: Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials YGR immediately after the case number instead of KAW or OAK. Re: #14 Waiver of Service Executed filed by Stacy Penning, #13 Waiver of Service Executed filed by Stacy Penning (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 07/03/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2019)
July 2, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
July 2, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Stacy Penning.. (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Gregory N. Longworth.(dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2019)
June 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13470592.) filed by Stacy Penning. (Longworth, Gregory) (Filed on 6/26/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2019 01:30 PM. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 24, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union, Local 1021. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/5/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE by Stacy Penning Notice of Interested Parties (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 6/21/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 6/21/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Stacy Penning . (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 6/21/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT re Class Action against Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13459395.). Filed byStacy Penning. (Hughes, Bradford) (Filed on 6/21/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penning v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Demain
Represented By: Scott Alan Kronland
Represented By: Eric Jason Wiesner
Represented By: Caren P. Sencer
Represented By: Patrick Casey Pitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Service Employees International Union
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Demain
Represented By: Scott Alan Kronland
Represented By: Patrick Casey Pitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Penning
Represented By: Bradford Grice Hughes
Represented By: Gregory N Longworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?