Lepkowski v. CamelBak Products, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Rachel Lepkowski
Defendant: CamelBak Products, LLC and CamelBak International, LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv04598
Filed: August 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Referring Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2019 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for MONDAY, 12/2/2019 02:00 PM before Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2019)
September 10, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION Regarding Local Rule 6-1, Enlarging or Shortening Time filed by Rachel Lepkowski, CambelBak Products LLC, CambelBak International LLC. (Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 9/10/2019) Modified on 9/11/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 9/5/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2019)
September 3, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rachel Lepkowski. CamelBak International, LLC served on 8/21/2019, answer due 9/11/2019. (Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 9/3/2019)
September 3, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rachel Lepkowski. CamelBak Products, LLC served on 8/21/2019, answer due 9/11/2019. (Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 9/3/2019)
August 30, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2019)
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rachel Lepkowski.. (Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 8/12/2019)
August 9, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CamelBak International, LLC, CamelBak Products, LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
August 9, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2019 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/22/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 8/8/2019)
August 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CamelBak International, LLC, CamelBak Products, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13592813.). Filed byRachel Lepkowski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Deckant, Neal) (Filed on 8/8/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lepkowski v. CamelBak Products, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Lepkowski
Represented By: Neal J. Deckant
Represented By: Scott Bursor
Represented By: L. Timothy Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CamelBak Products, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CamelBak International, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?